IRS unveils draft of proposed reporting rules for digital asset brokers

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has unveiled proposed regulations aimed at streamlining the reporting of digital asset transactions by brokers. These rules are designed to enhance tax compliance and simplify tax filing for individuals involved in digital asset trading. The new regulations introduced a novel Form 1099-DA, intended to help taxpayers accurately assess their tax liabilities, reducing the need for complex calculations or the utilization of digital asset tax preparation services.

The IRS’s move aligns digital asset reporting with existing reporting frameworks for traditional asset classes, ensuring a consistent and standardized approach to taxation. The proposed regulations, comprising a comprehensive 282-page draft, are part of the Biden administration’s efforts to implement the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). This legislative act is anticipated to generate approximately $28 billion in fresh tax revenue over a ten-year period.

Under these proposed rules, brokers would be required to implement the new reporting form starting in 2026, covering digital asset sales and exchanges carried out in 2025. The IRS is inviting written comments on the draft proposal until October 30, with at least one public hearing scheduled following the comment period.

Initial reactions to the proposal suggest potential challenges in its implementation. Kristin Smith, CEO of the Blockchain Association, an industry advocacy group, emphasizes the unique nature of the crypto ecosystem and the necessity for tailored rules to avoid unnecessary compliance burdens on participants.

Miller Whitehouse-Levine, CEO of DeFi Education Fund, expressed concerns regarding the IRS’s proposal, labeling it as confusing and misguided. He highlighted the attempt to apply traditional regulatory frameworks to digital assets, where intermediaries often do not exist.

Patrick McHenry, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, slammed the idea as yet another example of the Biden administration’s apparent hostility towards the digital asset ecosystem. McHenry argued that the rules should be modest, focused, and transparent, echoing lawmakers’ prior sentiments following the passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

McHenry commended the exemptions outlined in the proposal, which correspond with those in the Keep Innovation in America bill co-authored by himself and Rep. Ritchie Torres. The bill aims to rectify what McHenry perceives as inadequately constructed digital asset reporting provisions within the IIJA.

In anticipation of these regulations, advocacy group Coin Center had previously addressed digital asset taxation in a letter to Senators Ron Wyden and Mike Crapo. The letter presented recommendations specifically tailored to digital assets while raising concerns about data privacy implications.

As the IRS seeks to modernize taxation practices in the digital asset landscape, feedback from stakeholders and policymakers will play a pivotal role in shaping the final regulations. The balance between tax compliance and the unique characteristics of digital assets will be a central point of consideration in the rulemaking process.