- April 11, 2023
- Posted by: [email protected]
- Category:
In a recent unfortunate turn of events, Sentiment, a prominent liquidity lender protocol, fell victim to a malicious exploit on April 4, resulting in a significant loss of nearly $1 million. However, the team at Sentiment wasted no time in taking action to mitigate the damage, and through skillful negotiations, made an offer to the hacker in the form of a bounty worth $95,000.
In a daring move to recover the stolen funds, Sentiment took to the Arbitrum blockchain and sent a direct message to the hacker, offering a staggering $95,000 reward if the stolen funds were returned by April 6, and urging the hacker to do the right thing. Determined to right the wrong, Sentiment even extended the offer to anyone who could help locate and prosecute the culprit.
Taylor Monahan, the MetaMask developer, closely monitored the situation, and in a surprising turn of events, the hacker eventually returned 414 Ether, equivalent to around $771,000, in an initial transaction. But it didn’t stop there – the hacker went on to return another 51.75 ETH to the Sentiment recovery address. With bated breath, the Sentiment confirmed the receipt of the returned funds.
The aftermath of Sentiment’s recent hack left the crypto community buzzing with theories. Was it a re-entry attack or an exploit of a bug? Opinions were divided, with some praising the hacker’s audacity and criticizing the lack of seriousness towards bug bounties by companies. However, not everyone agreed, as other users deemed it a “bug bounty with a criminal step” and called for larger and more transparent bug bounties.
This incident has ignited a spirited debate about cybersecurity in the blockchain world, underscoring the need for robust measures to address vulnerabilities and safeguard user funds. Meanwhile, Sentiment’s relentless pursuit of recovering the stolen funds showcases their unwavering commitment to their users and their determination to combat malicious exploits in the ever-evolving world of blockchain technology.